Dive into the history of the museum and see who are the people behind the success of the Anglo-Boer War Museum.
Dive into the history of the Anglo-Boer War Museum
A society that acts as the liaison between the Museum and the people
See who are the people behind the success of the war museum
Dive into the history of the museum and see who are the people behind the success of the Anglo-Boer War Museum.
Dive into the history of the Anglo-Boer War Museum
A society that acts as the liaison between the Museum and the people
See the people behind the success of the Anglo-Boer War Museum
Read what happened in some of the biggest moments in South African history, where monuments are based and why they exist. Take a walk through history in our Exhibits and ready more about the struggles of the women that lived through the war.
Dive into the history of the war
Read more about our Collections
Read more about what the National Women's Memorial commemorates, as well as about the monument itself.
Take a virtual walk through the Heritage Route
Take a virtual walk through the Heritage Route
Dive into the history of the war
Take a virtual walk through the Heritage Route
Read more about our Collections
Take a walk through history in our Exhibitions
Read more about what the National Women's Memorial commemorates, as well as about the monument itself.
Search our database for more information on the war
Register and search our whole Document and Photo Archive collection.
Read through our Publications & Articles
A meeting point for all research around the war
Search our database for more information on the war
Register and search our whole Document and Photo Archive collection.
Read through our Publications & Articles
Although the British and Boers had a tradition of conducting siege warfare, the sieges of Mafeking, Kimberley and Ladysmith have always attracted controversy. With hindsight many historians argue that the Boers should have pressed home their early advantages by sustaining their advance into British territory rather than wasting men, ammunition, and time in sieges that ultimately proved futile. Similarly British historians complain that the sieges wrecked Buller’s strategy and led into costly relief expeditions. Arguably these sieges may have been unavoidable, especially in respect of Mafeking and Ladysmith, and even if their largely passive, artillery-based conduct could have been more robust, it too was in keeping with the culture of a risk-averse citizen army.
After the reports of ‘empty’ battlefields, and the shock of defeats and surrenders, British and imperial opinion took comfort from the determination displayed by those besieged. The siege commentary – uncensored letters, diaries, and later images and materials – reported in the British press testified to the impression that these events were a test of wills, leadership, resilience, and above all, pluck. They stirred memories (and myths) about previous colonial sieges, and provided insights upon the emotions aroused by these events (beyond the monotony and boredom) and the perceptions of the enemy, the involvement of Blacks, and the sense of imperial destiny.
Underused by many historians, this evidence provides scant support for the radical critiques of Gardner (1966), Price (1972), Judd and Surridge (2002) and Porter (2012) while amplifying the writings on popular imperialism by MacKenzie (1992, 1993 & 1998), Richards (2001) and Spiers (2006). By reviewing experiences in all three sieges, fresh light can be shed on British and colonial attitudes, concerns about Boer tactics, and the eruption of extraordinary scenes across the English-speaking empire after the relief of Mafeking.